3.0
Methodology

3.1
The submission includes evidence from a number of different sources (please see table below).

Title of data source Year Target Population Response Rate Method of survey Appendix
National Student Survey 2006 / 2007 2976 / 3135 1801 / 1968 Quantitative: mean scores for response on a sliding scale where 1= definitely disagree, 5= definitely agree and qualitative comments Appendix 2Appendix 3

Postgraduate Taught Student Survey

Bruss

2005
2006
2007

1302
1625
1505
114
151
182
Quantitative: mean scores for response on a sliding scale where 1= definitely disagree, 5= definitely agree

See survey results

Postgraduate Research Student Survey 2006
2007
778
809
112
186
Quantitative: mean scores for response on a sliding scale where 1= definitely disagree, 5= definitely agree See survey results

Kent Union Satisfaction survey

2005
2006
2007

2008

All students who are members of Kent Union 185
459
851

663
Quantitative and Qualitative See survey results

Appendix 13
Kent Union Course Rep Survey 2007
2008
215
265
134
84
Quantitative and Qualitative Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Access to Learning Fund Satisfaction Survey 2007 396 92 Quantitative and Qualitative Appendix 6
Kent Union Focus Groups
1. Learning and Teaching at Kent
2. Postgraduate Research Students experiences
3. Student Support

March 2008





 

11 students present

4 students present

6 students present

Qualitative Appendix 7

There is a great deal of value in using the sources listed above, especially the large scale surveys such as the NSS, which were devised by market research experts and have a high response rate. When analysing the information provided by final year students, comparisons to the sector average have been made where appropriate to get a sense of perspective on how the University is rated compared with other institutions. Similarly, the University has staff resources for carrying out research and it is useful for Kent Union to have access to this data. Several of the surveys had small response rates e.g. Kent Union’s November 2007 Satisfaction survey only had a 5% response rate, however the results still help provide an insight into students’ views and opinions. Whilst the Course Rep survey received a 62% response rate in 2007 and a 30% response rate in 2008, the data represents the views of a small minority of students; albeit those elected or appointed to represent the student population. This should be taken into consideration when the results from this survey are used in the report.